<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Auckland Architecture Association</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaa.org.nz/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaa.org.nz</link>
	<description>AAA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:38:33 +1200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Anderson &#124; Whare Tane &#124; Epsom by NS</title>
		<link>http://aaa.org.nz/2012/05/john-anderson-whare-tane-epsom/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>NS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaa.org.nz/?p=3242#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Adjoining 1200m2 epsom section also for sale - thats tempting for the developers - bad news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adjoining 1200m2 epsom section also for sale &#8211; thats tempting for the developers &#8211; bad news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Cloud by sam</title>
		<link>http://aaa.org.nz/2011/11/the-cloud/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaa.org.nz/?p=2606#comment-321</guid>
		<description>A bad case of form over function - it&#039;s attractive from the outside but one giant bottleneck inside. Designing it with just a few meters more width would really have helped. The larger revivification of that wharf area is nice though. People are using the wood chaises, fishing off the end of the wharf and walking around the Cloud and Shed to enjoy the view. Migt be nice to hold the expo&#039;s in the Shed and replace the Cloud with more user friendly elements e.g.: restrooms, food trucks, a small band shell, a permanent fair with rides, even just a small carousel...a platform to view the shipping are to the East? In fact just pick up that useless platform at Wynyard (why does anyone want to look at the top of chemical plants?) and stick it where the Cloud is - assuming the height will allow viewers to look over the shed to the cranes etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bad case of form over function &#8211; it&#8217;s attractive from the outside but one giant bottleneck inside. Designing it with just a few meters more width would really have helped. The larger revivification of that wharf area is nice though. People are using the wood chaises, fishing off the end of the wharf and walking around the Cloud and Shed to enjoy the view. Migt be nice to hold the expo&#8217;s in the Shed and replace the Cloud with more user friendly elements e.g.: restrooms, food trucks, a small band shell, a permanent fair with rides, even just a small carousel&#8230;a platform to view the shipping are to the East? In fact just pick up that useless platform at Wynyard (why does anyone want to look at the top of chemical plants?) and stick it where the Cloud is &#8211; assuming the height will allow viewers to look over the shed to the cranes etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Anderson &#124; Whare Tane &#124; Epsom by A. Mckenzie</title>
		<link>http://aaa.org.nz/2012/05/john-anderson-whare-tane-epsom/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Mckenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaa.org.nz/?p=3242#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Wow, what an amazing piece of Aucklands Architectural heritage, I&#039;m tempted to go and visit this as it may not be so readily available once sold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what an amazing piece of Aucklands Architectural heritage, I&#8217;m tempted to go and visit this as it may not be so readily available once sold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Novotel Auckland Airport by Peter Tavare</title>
		<link>http://aaa.org.nz/2012/05/novotel-auckland-airport/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Tavare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 03:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaa.org.nz/?p=3175#comment-318</guid>
		<description>If anyone has seen/stayed in a number of airport hotels around the world, the Novotel AKL Airport is truly outstanding. You could stay there without any need to catch a flight, such is the quality of the accommodation, the style, the art, concept and vision (not to mention a rather good restaurant). Asia Pacific seems to have redefined airport hotels. Just look at hotels such as Novotel Suvarnabhumi Airport in Bangkok and Novotel Citygate in Hong Kong...these hotels could be in the city centre, such is their quality. But I think the acknowledgement of Maori history and culture of Novotel Akl Airport makes it very special. It is not tokenism but inherent in everything the hotel does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone has seen/stayed in a number of airport hotels around the world, the Novotel AKL Airport is truly outstanding. You could stay there without any need to catch a flight, such is the quality of the accommodation, the style, the art, concept and vision (not to mention a rather good restaurant). Asia Pacific seems to have redefined airport hotels. Just look at hotels such as Novotel Suvarnabhumi Airport in Bangkok and Novotel Citygate in Hong Kong&#8230;these hotels could be in the city centre, such is their quality. But I think the acknowledgement of Maori history and culture of Novotel Akl Airport makes it very special. It is not tokenism but inherent in everything the hotel does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AAA Events by AAA Construction Site Tour &#124; Geyser &#124; Parnell &#124; Auckland Architecture Association</title>
		<link>http://aaa.org.nz/aaa-events/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>AAA Construction Site Tour &#124; Geyser &#124; Parnell &#124; Auckland Architecture Association</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaa.org.nz/?page_id=3144#comment-317</guid>
		<description>[...] First Flight &#8211; Geyser &#8211; 3.00 PM &#8211; June 2, 2012 &#8211; $35 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First Flight &#8211; Geyser &#8211; 3.00 PM &#8211; June 2, 2012 &#8211; $35 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Novotel Auckland Airport by NS</title>
		<link>http://aaa.org.nz/2012/05/novotel-auckland-airport/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>NS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 08:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaa.org.nz/?p=3175#comment-316</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in 5 minds about this one.

Its a building plonked smack within a carpark with little or no reference to it&#039;s immediate context.  (oh, other than it sits near the international terminal gates).  No real connection to the airport itself.  I suppose W&amp;M didn&#039;t want their building to touch the terminal building - ew germs - and fair enough.

It has an interesting aesthetic.  A bit more than a rectangle.  Haven&#039;t really seen this sorta thing in AKL or NZ.  Unique maybe.  I heard it was a copy.  But - as an Aucklander and knowing the area - an aesthetic very out of place - the Architects have lost sight/site a bit in this regard.  More and more I fell like W&amp;M are creating their own little bubble - it would pay for them to get out a little more.

However, as an international visitor, straight of a plane, quite impressive.  And I guess that was the brief.

What I do really like about this one (I have visited it) is that it does feel like something of quality - (leaving context out of it) this does feel Architecturally clean, well resolved and tidily detailed.  There are some really nice elements and enjoyable moments.  It has a presence (all be it an introspective selfish one), it has a character.

Best of all, the &quot;kiwiana&quot; is subtle and reserved.  This idea that we must theme our buildings for tourists so tackily NZ or Maori pains me - its so tacky - Architects as most of the visitors to our buildings have more intelligence than this.  Clouds, Weaving, Embracing Arms - none of that - phew.  Green Wall - Tick.

Overall - A Good Shag!  At the end of the day this is a piece of Architecture which surpasses the norm.  More please W&amp;M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in 5 minds about this one.</p>
<p>Its a building plonked smack within a carpark with little or no reference to it&#8217;s immediate context.  (oh, other than it sits near the international terminal gates).  No real connection to the airport itself.  I suppose W&amp;M didn&#8217;t want their building to touch the terminal building &#8211; ew germs &#8211; and fair enough.</p>
<p>It has an interesting aesthetic.  A bit more than a rectangle.  Haven&#8217;t really seen this sorta thing in AKL or NZ.  Unique maybe.  I heard it was a copy.  But &#8211; as an Aucklander and knowing the area &#8211; an aesthetic very out of place &#8211; the Architects have lost sight/site a bit in this regard.  More and more I fell like W&amp;M are creating their own little bubble &#8211; it would pay for them to get out a little more.</p>
<p>However, as an international visitor, straight of a plane, quite impressive.  And I guess that was the brief.</p>
<p>What I do really like about this one (I have visited it) is that it does feel like something of quality &#8211; (leaving context out of it) this does feel Architecturally clean, well resolved and tidily detailed.  There are some really nice elements and enjoyable moments.  It has a presence (all be it an introspective selfish one), it has a character.</p>
<p>Best of all, the &#8220;kiwiana&#8221; is subtle and reserved.  This idea that we must theme our buildings for tourists so tackily NZ or Maori pains me &#8211; its so tacky &#8211; Architects as most of the visitors to our buildings have more intelligence than this.  Clouds, Weaving, Embracing Arms &#8211; none of that &#8211; phew.  Green Wall &#8211; Tick.</p>
<p>Overall &#8211; A Good Shag!  At the end of the day this is a piece of Architecture which surpasses the norm.  More please W&amp;M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Novotel Auckland Airport by S. Carter</title>
		<link>http://aaa.org.nz/2012/05/novotel-auckland-airport/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 08:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaa.org.nz/?p=3175#comment-315</guid>
		<description>The building is part of a gateway to Auckland &amp; NZ, and will form a first impression of our city. While a commercial development cannot be required to consider things like that, its the end result either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The building is part of a gateway to Auckland &amp; NZ, and will form a first impression of our city. While a commercial development cannot be required to consider things like that, its the end result either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Novotel Auckland Airport by Kate</title>
		<link>http://aaa.org.nz/2012/05/novotel-auckland-airport/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 08:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaa.org.nz/?p=3175#comment-314</guid>
		<description>As with critiquing any building you want to know the site, context and conditions of the brief. However it seems that &quot;Shag or Bag&quot; is not about that. From the images the building looks fairly generic, simple and its only point of &#039;difference&#039; is the structure around the base. It would have been more interesting if this was carried throughout the building more, with enough transparency from the outside to see how that structure works with spaces inside.
Im not won over by this building...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with critiquing any building you want to know the site, context and conditions of the brief. However it seems that &#8220;Shag or Bag&#8221; is not about that. From the images the building looks fairly generic, simple and its only point of &#8216;difference&#8217; is the structure around the base. It would have been more interesting if this was carried throughout the building more, with enough transparency from the outside to see how that structure works with spaces inside.<br />
Im not won over by this building&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The New Intensity by Bobby</title>
		<link>http://aaa.org.nz/2012/04/the-new-intensity/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 04:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaa.org.nz/?p=3103#comment-299</guid>
		<description>The more peripheral areas of Auckland are fast becoming larger and more developed. In doing so, there seems to be two camps in the making - those who are adverse to the Auckland central area, and those who love it. Either way, it&#039;s amazing seeing the positive transformation of the central areas within only recent times. One can only be left to their own preference, but let&#039;s not hinder our city&#039;s natural and innovative growth with nonsense such as &quot;there&#039;s no other way other than sprawling out&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more peripheral areas of Auckland are fast becoming larger and more developed. In doing so, there seems to be two camps in the making &#8211; those who are adverse to the Auckland central area, and those who love it. Either way, it&#8217;s amazing seeing the positive transformation of the central areas within only recent times. One can only be left to their own preference, but let&#8217;s not hinder our city&#8217;s natural and innovative growth with nonsense such as &#8220;there&#8217;s no other way other than sprawling out&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brakes Pulled on Port Expansion by Alastair McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://aaa.org.nz/2012/03/brakes-pulled-on-port-expansion/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaa.org.nz/?p=3068#comment-218</guid>
		<description>@ Ben
Yes i saw your posts on View on Auckland...  Likewise we have been making submissions, holding hearings, making noise when we can, its great to see there is finally some recognition of this noise - its great to see them considering what we think to be the obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ben<br />
Yes i saw your posts on View on Auckland&#8230;  Likewise we have been making submissions, holding hearings, making noise when we can, its great to see there is finally some recognition of this noise &#8211; its great to see them considering what we think to be the obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

